<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Family Law Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://familylawexplained.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://familylawexplained.com</link>
	<description>Here to make family law more accessible to the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 20:35:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Termination of Parental Rights by whitney</title>
		<link>http://familylawexplained.com/paternity/termination-of-parental-rights/#comment-1676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whitney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 20:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familylawexplained.com/?page_id=42#comment-1676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My ex-husband has moved more than 2 hours away and rarely uses his parental time and when he does he is always at work. He is not financially able to pay child support(evne though ORS has been garnishing his wages, he does not make enought to make a full months support), child care, or medical. We have talked about the possibility of him signing over his rights but are unsure on how to go about it, if that is what he decides to do. He has seen our son a handful of times at best in the last year and, in my opinion, really has no interest in raising him. I am financially capable of raising him on my own and believe this would be the best situation for my son, rather than force him to go with someone that he barely knows and stay with him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My ex-husband has moved more than 2 hours away and rarely uses his parental time and when he does he is always at work. He is not financially able to pay child support(evne though ORS has been garnishing his wages, he does not make enought to make a full months support), child care, or medical. We have talked about the possibility of him signing over his rights but are unsure on how to go about it, if that is what he decides to do. He has seen our son a handful of times at best in the last year and, in my opinion, really has no interest in raising him. I am financially capable of raising him on my own and believe this would be the best situation for my son, rather than force him to go with someone that he barely knows and stay with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to pay child support by Darren Jamieson</title>
		<link>http://familylawexplained.com/2012/02/14/how-to-pay-child-support/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Jamieson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familylawexplained.com/?p=265#comment-1282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Putting what the check is for, and which time period, is a good idea. You could easily find that any money you have paid for child support isn&#039;t being treated as such and that you&#039;ll have to pay again. That is very common.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting what the check is for, and which time period, is a good idea. You could easily find that any money you have paid for child support isn&#8217;t being treated as such and that you&#8217;ll have to pay again. That is very common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Termination of Parental Rights by paulwaldron</title>
		<link>http://familylawexplained.com/paternity/termination-of-parental-rights/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulwaldron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familylawexplained.com/?page_id=42#comment-1203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under Utah law, a boyfriend cannot adopt his girlfriend&#039;s child.  &quot;A child may not be adopted by a person who is cohabiting in a relationship that is not a legally valid and binding marriage under the laws of this state.&quot;  Section 78B-6-117(3), Utah Code Annotated.

Under Utah law, a child and the adoptive parent must live in the same home for six months.  See Section 78B-6-136.5(1), Utah Code Annotated.  However, a stepparent must be married to the natural or legal parent and have lived in the same home as the child for one year before the stepparent can adopt the child.  &quot;If the adoptive parent is the spouse of the birth parent, a final decree of adoption may not be entered until the child has lived in the home of that adoptive parent for one year, unless, based on a finding of good cause, the court orders that the final decree of adoption may be entered at an earlier time.&quot;  Section 78B-6-136.5(2), Utah Code Annotated.

Under Utah law, a birth/natural parent and that parent&#039;s paramour (boyfriend or girlfriend) will have to be married and the stepparent will have had to have lived in the same home as the child for one year for the decree of adoption to be entered by the court.  So, Charity, in your case, if your boyfriend is not living with you and your children, a judge cannot let him adopt you children because they have not been living in the same home.  If your boyfriend is living with you and your children, the judge cannot let your boyfriend adopt your children because, as stated in the law cited above, you are living together in a relationship that is not &quot;a legally valid and binding marriage under the laws of this state [Utah].&quot;

Sometimes I have been able to get around the one year rule when the birth parent and child have been living with the stepparent for more than one year but they have not been married for one year.  Another option is for you and your boyfriend to file for a declaration of a common law marriage and have it declared a marriage since a certain date.  You would likely need the assistance of a lawyer to help you with this option.

These are just some thoughts on the bare facts presented and do not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under Utah law, a boyfriend cannot adopt his girlfriend&#8217;s child.  &#8220;A child may not be adopted by a person who is cohabiting in a relationship that is not a legally valid and binding marriage under the laws of this state.&#8221;  Section 78B-6-117(3), Utah Code Annotated.</p>
<p>Under Utah law, a child and the adoptive parent must live in the same home for six months.  See Section 78B-6-136.5(1), Utah Code Annotated.  However, a stepparent must be married to the natural or legal parent and have lived in the same home as the child for one year before the stepparent can adopt the child.  &#8220;If the adoptive parent is the spouse of the birth parent, a final decree of adoption may not be entered until the child has lived in the home of that adoptive parent for one year, unless, based on a finding of good cause, the court orders that the final decree of adoption may be entered at an earlier time.&#8221;  Section 78B-6-136.5(2), Utah Code Annotated.</p>
<p>Under Utah law, a birth/natural parent and that parent&#8217;s paramour (boyfriend or girlfriend) will have to be married and the stepparent will have had to have lived in the same home as the child for one year for the decree of adoption to be entered by the court.  So, Charity, in your case, if your boyfriend is not living with you and your children, a judge cannot let him adopt you children because they have not been living in the same home.  If your boyfriend is living with you and your children, the judge cannot let your boyfriend adopt your children because, as stated in the law cited above, you are living together in a relationship that is not &#8220;a legally valid and binding marriage under the laws of this state [Utah].&#8221;</p>
<p>Sometimes I have been able to get around the one year rule when the birth parent and child have been living with the stepparent for more than one year but they have not been married for one year.  Another option is for you and your boyfriend to file for a declaration of a common law marriage and have it declared a marriage since a certain date.  You would likely need the assistance of a lawyer to help you with this option.</p>
<p>These are just some thoughts on the bare facts presented and do not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Termination of Parental Rights by Charity</title>
		<link>http://familylawexplained.com/paternity/termination-of-parental-rights/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familylawexplained.com/?page_id=42#comment-1199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to have my kids dad have his rights terminated because he doesnt do anything for them now and my bohfriend wants to adopt them in their eyes he is their dad anyways]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to have my kids dad have his rights terminated because he doesnt do anything for them now and my bohfriend wants to adopt them in their eyes he is their dad anyways</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Child Support by paulwaldron</title>
		<link>http://familylawexplained.com/divorce/child-support/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulwaldron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familylawexplained.com/?page_id=36#comment-1125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the blog at http://familylawexplained.com/2012/02/14/how-to-pay-child-support/.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the blog at <a href="http://familylawexplained.com/2012/02/14/how-to-pay-child-support/" rel="nofollow">http://familylawexplained.com/2012/02/14/how-to-pay-child-support/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Divorce by paulwaldron</title>
		<link>http://familylawexplained.com/divorce/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulwaldron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familylawexplained.com/divorce/#comment-1035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ian,

In Utah, all other things being equal (meaning that the Decree of Divorce generally follows the statutory provisions regarding child custody and parent-time as found in Sections &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE30/htm/30_03_001000.htm&quot; title=&quot;Section 30-3-10, Utah Code Annotated&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;30-3-10&lt;/a&gt; through &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE30/htm/30_03_001009.htm&quot; title=&quot;Section 30-3-10.9, Utah Code Annotated&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;30-3-10.9&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE30/htm/30_03_003200.htm&quot; title=&quot;Section 30-3-32, Utah Code Annotated&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;30-3-32&lt;/a&gt; through &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE30/htm/30_03_004000.htm&quot; title=&quot;Section 30-3-40, Utah Code Annotated&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;30-3-40&lt;/a&gt;, U.C.A.), pursuant to Section &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE30/htm/30_03_003700.htm&quot; title=&quot;Section 30-3-37, Utah Code Annotated, Relocation&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;30-3-37&lt;/a&gt;, U.C.A. you can request a hearing, even an expedited hearing (see subsection (12)) before the court to review the parent-time order.

A more aggressive option is to file a &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://familylawexplained.com/petition-to-modify/&quot; title=&quot;Family Law Explained, Petition to Modify&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;petition to modify&lt;/a&gt; your decree of divorce.  The court will look at the factors found in the statutes cited above, as well as the factors found in &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://www.utcourts.gov/resources/rules/ucja/ch04/4-903.htm&quot; title=&quot;Rule 4-903, Utah Uniform custody evaluations&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rule 4-903, Uniform custody evaluations&lt;/a&gt;, Rules of Judicial Administration, especially subsection (5).  

A noncustodial parent must marshal significant facts to overcome the status quo of the existing ordered custody arrangement.  Oft times the noncustodial parent will have to engage an expert witness in the form of a custody evaluator, which is considered quite costly to most parents.  If the facts and circumstances are right and the noncustodial parent can gather enough evidence/facts (witnesses, documents, other experts), a custody evaluation is not always necessary.  However, if a parent decides to proceed without a custody evaluation because of expense, that saved expense is often then expended on the lawyer having to prepare all the evidence for presentation to the court at trial that the custody evaluator would otherwise have considered and included in the custody evaluation report.  Another benefit to a custody evaluation is that it often leads to the parties to settlement without having to go to trial.  This is not to say that a custody evaluation is always the best way to go for a parent, but is an option to be carefully considered by a parent with their lawyer before deciding whether or not to take that course of action.

To summarize, a parent in Utah has two options to protect their visitation rights, request a hearing before the court by motion or petition the court to modify the existing court orders regarding custody and parent-time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian,</p>
<p>In Utah, all other things being equal (meaning that the Decree of Divorce generally follows the statutory provisions regarding child custody and parent-time as found in Sections <a href="http://http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE30/htm/30_03_001000.htm" title="Section 30-3-10, Utah Code Annotated" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">30-3-10</a> through <a href="http://http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE30/htm/30_03_001009.htm" title="Section 30-3-10.9, Utah Code Annotated" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">30-3-10.9</a> and <a href="http://http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE30/htm/30_03_003200.htm" title="Section 30-3-32, Utah Code Annotated" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">30-3-32</a> through <a href="http://http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE30/htm/30_03_004000.htm" title="Section 30-3-40, Utah Code Annotated" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">30-3-40</a>, U.C.A.), pursuant to Section <a href="http://http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE30/htm/30_03_003700.htm" title="Section 30-3-37, Utah Code Annotated, Relocation" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">30-3-37</a>, U.C.A. you can request a hearing, even an expedited hearing (see subsection (12)) before the court to review the parent-time order.</p>
<p>A more aggressive option is to file a <a href="http://http://familylawexplained.com/petition-to-modify/" title="Family Law Explained, Petition to Modify" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">petition to modify</a> your decree of divorce.  The court will look at the factors found in the statutes cited above, as well as the factors found in <a href="http://http://www.utcourts.gov/resources/rules/ucja/ch04/4-903.htm" title="Rule 4-903, Utah Uniform custody evaluations" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Rule 4-903, Uniform custody evaluations</a>, Rules of Judicial Administration, especially subsection (5).  </p>
<p>A noncustodial parent must marshal significant facts to overcome the status quo of the existing ordered custody arrangement.  Oft times the noncustodial parent will have to engage an expert witness in the form of a custody evaluator, which is considered quite costly to most parents.  If the facts and circumstances are right and the noncustodial parent can gather enough evidence/facts (witnesses, documents, other experts), a custody evaluation is not always necessary.  However, if a parent decides to proceed without a custody evaluation because of expense, that saved expense is often then expended on the lawyer having to prepare all the evidence for presentation to the court at trial that the custody evaluator would otherwise have considered and included in the custody evaluation report.  Another benefit to a custody evaluation is that it often leads to the parties to settlement without having to go to trial.  This is not to say that a custody evaluation is always the best way to go for a parent, but is an option to be carefully considered by a parent with their lawyer before deciding whether or not to take that course of action.</p>
<p>To summarize, a parent in Utah has two options to protect their visitation rights, request a hearing before the court by motion or petition the court to modify the existing court orders regarding custody and parent-time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Divorce by Ian</title>
		<link>http://familylawexplained.com/divorce/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familylawexplained.com/divorce/#comment-1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a noncustodial parent that has visitation rights every other weekend with my daughter. The mother is threatening to take the child and leave. My question is what can I do to protect my visitation and rights to see my child so that she isn&#039;t taken away from me (out of state) ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a noncustodial parent that has visitation rights every other weekend with my daughter. The mother is threatening to take the child and leave. My question is what can I do to protect my visitation and rights to see my child so that she isn&#8217;t taken away from me (out of state) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Extra-marital property by Property Settlement</title>
		<link>http://familylawexplained.com/2011/08/04/extra-marital-property/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Property Settlement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 20:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familylawexplained.com/?p=139#comment-837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are several factors to a family law financial property settlement which the court will consider. These factors can include:
1.      Assets held by each party including superannuation
2.      Domestic duties performed by either party such as household chores
3.      Who looked after the children
4.      Gifts received by either party
5.      How much did each party contribute financially
6.      Any inheritances]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several factors to a family law financial property settlement which the court will consider. These factors can include:<br />
1.      Assets held by each party including superannuation<br />
2.      Domestic duties performed by either party such as household chores<br />
3.      Who looked after the children<br />
4.      Gifts received by either party<br />
5.      How much did each party contribute financially<br />
6.      Any inheritances</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Extra-marital property by paulwaldron</title>
		<link>http://familylawexplained.com/2011/08/04/extra-marital-property/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulwaldron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familylawexplained.com/?p=139#comment-836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This specific comment appears to be specific to Australia, but it is generally true in many, many other jurisdictions.  These kinds of cases are cases &quot;in equity&quot; rather than &quot;at law,&quot; meaning that the court has great latitude to come up with a &quot;fair&quot; result rather than a legally determined &quot;money judgment.&quot;  Generally &quot;just and equitable&quot; means that the court will start from a position of equal (50/50), but may move from that based on the specific facts of a case and what may seem &quot;fair&quot; to one party in these cases may not seem so to the court or the other party.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This specific comment appears to be specific to Australia, but it is generally true in many, many other jurisdictions.  These kinds of cases are cases &#8220;in equity&#8221; rather than &#8220;at law,&#8221; meaning that the court has great latitude to come up with a &#8220;fair&#8221; result rather than a legally determined &#8220;money judgment.&#8221;  Generally &#8220;just and equitable&#8221; means that the court will start from a position of equal (50/50), but may move from that based on the specific facts of a case and what may seem &#8220;fair&#8221; to one party in these cases may not seem so to the court or the other party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why mediation works by paulwaldron</title>
		<link>http://familylawexplained.com/2011/11/17/why-mediation-works/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulwaldron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familylawexplained.com/?p=156#comment-835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely!  Family law cases are generally not well suited for traditional courts, but often traditional courts are the only forum seen for resolution.  Collaborative law is better alternative in most family law cases, and people seeking relief in these kinds of cases should seriously consider collaborative law.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely!  Family law cases are generally not well suited for traditional courts, but often traditional courts are the only forum seen for resolution.  Collaborative law is better alternative in most family law cases, and people seeking relief in these kinds of cases should seriously consider collaborative law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

